relation: be in math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, account
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.55
, third party
Weight: 0.53
Siblings friendship
Weight: 0.61
, identity
Weight: 0.60
, servant
Weight: 0.59
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
, term
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in math 1.00
be important in math 0.97
be related in math 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(factor, be important in math)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(relation, be in math)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(factor, be related in math)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(relation, be in math)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(relation, be in math)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(factor, be related in math)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(relation, be in math)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(relation, be in math)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in math)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(relation, be in math)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related in math)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(factor, be important in math)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(relation, be in math)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(relation, be in math)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(factor, be related in math)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(relation, be in math)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(relation, be in math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(relation, be in math)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(relation, be in math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(relation, be in math)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(relation, be in math)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(relation, be in math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(relation, be in math)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(relation, be in math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(relation, be in math)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, be important in math)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(relation, be in math)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(factor, be related in math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(relation, be in math)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(factor, be related in math)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(relation, be in math)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, be important in math)