relation: be vs relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, account
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.55
, third party
Weight: 0.53
Siblings friendship
Weight: 0.61
, identity
Weight: 0.60
, servant
Weight: 0.59
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
, term
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs relationship 1.00
be in relationship 0.86
be important in relationship 0.84
be better than relationship 0.82
be more important than relationship 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(third party, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(relation, be vs relationship)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(third party, be in relationship)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(third party, be in relationship)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(friendship, be more important than relationship)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(friendship, be better than relationship)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(friendship, be important in relationship)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(third party, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(relation, be vs relationship)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(friendship, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(friendship, be important in relationship)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(friendship, be better than relationship)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(friendship, be better than relationship)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(friendship, be more important than relationship)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(friendship, be more important than relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(relation, be vs relationship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(relation, be vs relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(relation, be vs relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(third party, be in relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(friendship, be important in relationship)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(friendship, be more important than relationship)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(friendship, be better than relationship)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(relation, be vs relationship)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(third party, be in relationship)