relation: was with mexico difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, account
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.55
, third party
Weight: 0.53
Siblings friendship
Weight: 0.61
, identity
Weight: 0.60
, servant
Weight: 0.59
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
, term
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
was with mexico difficult 1.00
was with mexico difficult during 1754 0.98
was with mexico 0.94
was with mexico during 1754 0.93
harm mexico 0.84
were for americans difficult 0.83
were for african americans difficult during depression 0.82
were for african americans difficult 0.82
were for americans difficult during depression 0.81
were in japan different from conditions in germany 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(factor, harm mexico)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(condition, were for african americans difficult during depression)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(condition, were for african americans difficult)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(condition, were for americans difficult)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(condition, were for americans difficult during depression)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(condition, were for americans difficult)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(condition, were for americans difficult during depression)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(condition, were for african americans difficult)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(condition, were for african americans difficult during depression)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(factor, harm mexico)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(condition, were for african americans difficult during depression)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(condition, were for americans difficult during depression)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(condition, were for americans difficult)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(condition, were for african americans difficult)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(factor, harm mexico)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(factor, harm mexico)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(condition, were for african americans difficult during depression)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(condition, were for african americans difficult)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(condition, were for americans difficult)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(condition, were for americans difficult during depression)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(relation, was with mexico difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico during 1754)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult during 1754)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult during 1754)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(relation, was with mexico during 1754)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(relation, was with mexico)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico during 1754)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico during 1754)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(relation, was with mexico difficult during 1754)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult during 1754)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(condition, were for americans difficult)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(condition, were for americans difficult during depression)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condition, were for african americans difficult)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(factor, harm mexico)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(condition, were for african americans difficult during depression)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(condition, were for americans difficult)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(factor, harm mexico)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(condition, were for americans difficult during depression)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condition, were for african americans difficult)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(condition, were for african americans difficult during depression)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)