remote control: is terrible

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents control
Weight: 0.80
, electronic device
Weight: 0.72
, interface
Weight: 0.66
, information
Weight: 0.65
Siblings joystick
Weight: 0.56
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.36
, network device
Weight: 0.36
, security system
Weight: 0.35
, computer network
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is terrible 1.00
is awful 0.88
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(control, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(remote control, is terrible)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(control, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(control, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(security system, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(control, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(remote control, is terrible)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(security system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(security system, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(remote control, is terrible)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(remote control, is awful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(remote control, is awful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(remote control, is awful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(remote control, is awful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(remote control, is terrible)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(remote control, is terrible)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(control, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(security system, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(remote control, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(control, has quality bad)