remote control: use infrared

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents control
Weight: 0.80
, electronic device
Weight: 0.72
, interface
Weight: 0.66
, information
Weight: 0.65
Siblings joystick
Weight: 0.56
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.36
, network device
Weight: 0.36
, security system
Weight: 0.35
, computer network
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
use infrared 1.00
use infrared light 0.98
be from sensors 0.77
be encoded in electromagnetic waves 0.75
be from sensors sent to computer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(control, use infrared light)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(remote control, use infrared)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(remote control, use infrared)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(control, use infrared light)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(remote control, use infrared)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(control, use infrared light)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(control, use infrared light)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(remote control, use infrared)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(remote control, use infrared)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(remote control, use infrared)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(remote control, use infrared)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(remote control, use infrared)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(remote control, use infrared light)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(remote control, use infrared)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(remote control, use infrared light)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(remote control, use infrared)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(remote control, use infrared light)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(remote control, use infrared)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(remote control, use infrared light)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(remote control, use infrared)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(remote control, use infrared)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(remote control, use infrared)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(remote control, use infrared)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(remote control, use infrared)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(remote control, use infrared)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(control, use infrared light)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(remote control, use infrared)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(control, use infrared light)