rent: be comparatively cheaper than buying

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.37
, fee
Weight: 0.34
, allowance
Weight: 0.34
, purchase
Weight: 0.33
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be comparatively cheaper than buying 1.00
is expensive 0.80
get expensive 0.80
be higher than than xb1 0.79
is own cheap 0.78
be on coinbase higher than poloniex 0.78
be cheaper at consumer cooperative 0.78
be cheaper on amazon 0.77
be higher on newegg 0.76
be more expensive than mortgage 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(payment, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(payment, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sum, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sum, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(payment, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(payment, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rent, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(rent, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(rent, be more expensive than mortgage)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rent, be more expensive than mortgage)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(rent, be more expensive than mortgage)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rent, be more expensive than mortgage)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rent, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rent, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(payment, is expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sum, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(price, be cheaper at consumer cooperative)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(payment, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sum, is expensive)