rent: be determined

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.37
, fee
Weight: 0.34
, allowance
Weight: 0.34
, purchase
Weight: 0.33
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be determined 1.00
be determined for property 0.85
be determined in competitive market 0.80
be determined under pure competition 0.79
be determined under trade system 0.79
be determined under imperfect market 0.78
be determined at bell 0.78
be determined in functioning economy 0.76
be determined for commercial property 0.76
be determined in well functioning economy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(price, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rent, be determined)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(price, be determined in competitive market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rent, be determined)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(price, be determined under imperfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rent, be determined)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(price, be determined in well functioning economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rent, be determined)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(price, be determined)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(price, be determined in well functioning economy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(price, be determined under imperfect market)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(price, be determined in competitive market)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(price, be determined under imperfect market)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(price, be determined in competitive market)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(price, be determined in well functioning economy)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(price, be determined)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(price, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(rent, be determined)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(price, be determined in competitive market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(rent, be determined)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(price, be determined under imperfect market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(rent, be determined)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(price, be determined in well functioning economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(rent, be determined)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(rent, be determined)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(rent, be determined for property)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(rent, be determined for property)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(rent, be determined for property)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rent, be determined for commercial property)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(rent, be determined for property)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(rent, be determined for commercial property)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(rent, be determined for commercial property)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(rent, be determined for commercial property)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rent, be determined)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rent, be determined)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(price, be determined)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(price, be determined in well functioning economy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(price, be determined under imperfect market)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(price, be determined in competitive market)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(price, be determined)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(price, be determined in well functioning economy)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(price, be determined under imperfect market)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(rent, be determined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(price, be determined in competitive market)