rent: be expensive in new city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.37
, fee
Weight: 0.34
, allowance
Weight: 0.34
, purchase
Weight: 0.33
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in new city expensive 1.00
be expensive in new city 1.00
be expensive in city 0.96
be in city expensive 0.96
be in new city 0.93
be in city 0.86
be high in panamá city 0.84
be high in city 0.84
is expensive 0.84
get expensive 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in new city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(payment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in new city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(payment, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sum, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sum, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(payment, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rent, be expensive in new city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(payment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rent, be expensive in new city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(rent, be expensive in new city)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(rent, be expensive in city)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in city)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rent, be expensive in city)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rent, be in city)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rent, be in city)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(rent, be high in panamá city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rent, be high in city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rent, be high in panamá city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rent, be high in city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(rent, is expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rent, is expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(rent, be in city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in panamá city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rent, is expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in panamá city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rent, be in city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rent, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in new city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in new city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(payment, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sum, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(payment, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(rent, be expensive in new city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sum, is expensive)