rent: be expensive in york city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.37
, fee
Weight: 0.34
, allowance
Weight: 0.34
, purchase
Weight: 0.33
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in york city expensive 1.00
be expensive in york city 1.00
be in new york city expensive 0.99
be expensive in new york city 0.99
be in york city 0.97
be in london expensive 0.83
be expensive in california 0.79
be high in nyc 0.79
be in london 0.78
be high in london 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rent, be expensive in york city)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in new york city)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(rent, be expensive in new york city)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rent, be expensive in new york city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(rent, be in london expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rent, be in london expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(rent, be in london expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in new york city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(rent, be expensive in california)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rent, be in london)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(rent, be in london)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rent, be high in nyc)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rent, be high in nyc)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in california)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rent, be high in london)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rent, be high in london)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(rent, be in london expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(rent, be in london)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rent, be expensive in california)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in nyc)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in london)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in california)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in nyc)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rent, be in london)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in london)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in york city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rent, be expensive in york city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in york city)