rent: have increase

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.37
, fee
Weight: 0.34
, allowance
Weight: 0.34
, purchase
Weight: 0.33
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have increase 1.00
increase 0.98
be on rise 0.81
increase in atmosphere 0.81
rise over time 0.80
be increased amount remains 0.80
be increased amount of work remains 0.79
go rise 0.79
increase in inflation 0.78
be increased amount done remains 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(amount, be increased amount of work remains)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rent, have increase)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(amount, increase in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rent, have increase)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(amount, increase in atmosphere)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(amount, be increased amount of work remains)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amount, be increased amount of work remains)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(amount, increase in atmosphere)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(allowance, increase)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(amount, increase in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(rent, have increase)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(amount, be increased amount of work remains)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(rent, have increase)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(allowance, increase)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(allowance, increase)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(rent, have increase)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(rent, increase)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(rent, increase)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(rent, increase)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(rent, increase)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(rent, have increase)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rent, have increase)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(amount, increase in atmosphere)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(amount, be increased amount of work remains)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(allowance, increase)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(amount, increase in atmosphere)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(rent, have increase)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(amount, be increased amount of work remains)