rent: increase

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.37
, fee
Weight: 0.34
, allowance
Weight: 0.34
, purchase
Weight: 0.33
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
increase 1.00
have increase 0.98
increase in atmosphere 0.81
be on rise 0.80
increase in inflation 0.79
go rise 0.79
rise over time 0.78
rise in market 0.78
be increased amount remains 0.78
drop 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(price, rise in market)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(rent, increase)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(amount, increase in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(rent, increase)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(amount, increase in atmosphere)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(price, rise in market)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(price, rise in market)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(amount, increase in atmosphere)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(allowance, increase)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(amount, increase in atmosphere)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(rent, increase)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(price, rise in market)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(rent, increase)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(allowance, increase)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(allowance, increase)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(rent, increase)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rent, have increase)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(rent, have increase)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(rent, have increase)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(rent, have increase)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(rent, increase)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(rent, increase)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(amount, increase in atmosphere)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(price, rise in market)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(allowance, increase)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(amount, increase in atmosphere)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(rent, increase)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(price, rise in market)