renting: be in denver

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.49
, home
Weight: 0.44
, area
Weight: 0.36
, real estate
Weight: 0.34
, buying
Weight: 0.31
Siblings stock option
Weight: 0.30
, home owner
Weight: 0.30
, pay
Weight: 0.29
, lock
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in denver 1.00
be in denver expensive 0.96
be in seattle 0.82
be in nyc 0.81
be in seattle expensive 0.81
be in nyc freaking 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(renting, be in denver)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(renting, be in denver expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(renting, be in denver expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(renting, be in denver expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(renting, be in denver expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(renting, be in seattle)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(renting, be in nyc freaking)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(renting, be in seattle)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(renting, be in nyc freaking)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(renting, be in seattle expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(renting, be in seattle expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(renting, be in nyc)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(renting, be in nyc)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(renting, be in nyc freaking)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(renting, be in seattle)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(renting, be in nyc freaking)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(renting, be in seattle expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(renting, be in seattle)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(renting, be in nyc)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(renting, be in seattle expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(renting, be in nyc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(renting, be in denver)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(renting, be in denver)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(renting, be in denver)