renting: be mutually beneficial

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.49
, home
Weight: 0.44
, area
Weight: 0.36
, real estate
Weight: 0.34
, buying
Weight: 0.31
Siblings stock option
Weight: 0.30
, home owner
Weight: 0.30
, pay
Weight: 0.29
, lock
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be mutually beneficial 1.00
be beneficial 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(buying, be beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(renting, be mutually beneficial)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(renting, be mutually beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(buying, be beneficial)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(renting, be mutually beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(buying, be beneficial)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(buying, be beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(renting, be mutually beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(renting, be mutually beneficial)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(renting, be mutually beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(renting, be mutually beneficial)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(renting, be mutually beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(renting, be beneficial)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(renting, be mutually beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(renting, be beneficial)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(renting, be mutually beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(renting, be beneficial)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(renting, be mutually beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(renting, be beneficial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(renting, be mutually beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(renting, be mutually beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(renting, be mutually beneficial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(renting, be mutually beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(renting, be mutually beneficial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(renting, be mutually beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(buying, be beneficial)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(renting, be mutually beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(buying, be beneficial)