repairman: be at repair shop

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.51
, worker
Weight: 0.47
, employee
Weight: 0.47
, specialist
Weight: 0.45
, visitor
Weight: 0.43
Siblings technician
Weight: 0.33
, salesman
Weight: 0.33
, mechanic
Weight: 0.32
, machinist
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at repair shop 1.00
attempt repair 0.82
fix break car 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, be at repair shop)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, be at repair shop)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(technician, be at repair shop)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(technician, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(technician, be at repair shop)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(mechanic, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mechanic, be at repair shop)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mechanic, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mechanic, be at repair shop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(repairman, be at repair shop)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(repairman, attempt repair)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(repairman, fix break car)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(repairman, attempt repair)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(repairman, fix break car)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(repairman, attempt repair)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(repairman, fix break car)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(repairman, attempt repair)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(repairman, fix break car)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(repairman, be at repair shop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(repairman, be at repair shop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(mechanic, be at repair shop)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mechanic, be at repair shop)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(repairman, be at repair shop)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(technician, be at repair shop)