repetition: is literary device

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, parameter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings melody
Weight: 0.33
, randomness
Weight: 0.33
, cliche
Weight: 0.33
, rhythm
Weight: 0.33
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is literary device 1.00
is literary 0.91
is device 0.82
is rhetorical device 0.80
be useful rhetorical device for political speech 0.78
be useful rhetorical device for speech 0.78
is effective rhetorical device 0.77
be used in poetry 0.76
be used in literature 0.75
be important in poetry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rhythm, be used in poetry)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rhythm, be important in poetry)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(rhythm, be used in poetry)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(rhythm, be used in poetry)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(rhythm, be important in poetry)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rhythm, be important in poetry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(repetition, is literary device)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(repetition, is literary)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(repetition, is literary)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(repetition, is device)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(repetition, is device)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(repetition, is rhetorical device)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(repetition, is rhetorical device)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(repetition, is effective rhetorical device)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for speech)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(repetition, is effective rhetorical device)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(repetition, is literary)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(repetition, is device)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(repetition, be used in poetry)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(repetition, be used in literature)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(repetition, be important in poetry)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(repetition, is rhetorical device)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for speech)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(repetition, be used in literature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(repetition, is effective rhetorical device)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(repetition, be used in literature)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(repetition, be used in poetry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for speech)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(repetition, be important in poetry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(repetition, be used in poetry)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(repetition, be important in poetry)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is literary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(repetition, be used in poetry)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(repetition, be used in literature)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for speech)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(repetition, be important in poetry)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is effective rhetorical device)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is device)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is rhetorical device)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(repetition, is literary device)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(rhythm, be used in poetry)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rhythm, be important in poetry)