replication: be basis of good science

Related concepts

Parents	function Weight: 0.63 , feature Weight: 0.60 , operation Weight: 0.58 , technology Weight: 0.58
Siblings	trigonometric function Weight: 0.33 , configuration Weight: 0.33 , synthesis Weight: 0.33 , recombination Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be basis of good science	1.00
be basis of science	0.98
be important in science	0.84
be important to science	0.84
be necessary in science	0.83
be such important function of science	0.78
be important in scientific research	0.77
be in scientific experiments important	0.76
be important to scientific process	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(replication, be basis of good science)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(technology, be important to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(replication, be basis of good science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(technology, be important to science)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(technology, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to science)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(replication, be basis of good science)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(technology, be important to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(replication, be basis of good science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(replication, be basis of good science)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(replication, be basis of science)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(replication, be basis of science)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(replication, be basis of science)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(replication, be basis of science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(replication, be necessary in science)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(replication, be necessary in science)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to science)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(replication, be important in science)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(replication, be important to science)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in science)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(replication, be necessary in science)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(replication, be important to science)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(replication, be important in science)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(replication, be important to science)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(replication, be important in science)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(replication, be such important function of science)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(replication, be such important function of science)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to scientific process)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(replication, be in scientific experiments important)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(replication, be in scientific experiments important)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(replication, be important to scientific process)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(replication, be important in scientific research)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(replication, be in scientific experiments important)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(replication, be such important function of science)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(replication, be important to scientific process)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(replication, be in scientific experiments important)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(replication, be such important function of science)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(replication, be important to scientific process)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(replication, be important in scientific research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(replication, be basis of good science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(replication, be basis of good science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)