replication: be important element of scientific process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.63
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, configuration
Weight: 0.33
, synthesis
Weight: 0.33
, recombination
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important element of scientific process 1.00
be important to scientific process 0.95
be important in research process 0.87
be important in scientific research 0.84
be in scientific experiments important 0.84
be such important function of science 0.82
be important to science 0.82
be important in science 0.82
be in scientific experiments 0.80
be necessary in science 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, be important to science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(technology, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to science)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(replication, be important element of scientific process)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(replication, be important in research process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(replication, be important in research process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(replication, be in scientific experiments)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(replication, be important to science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(replication, be such important function of science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(replication, be important in science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in research process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(replication, be in scientific experiments)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(replication, be necessary in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in research process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(replication, be necessary in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(replication, be in scientific experiments)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(replication, be important to science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(replication, be such important function of science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(replication, be important in science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(replication, be necessary in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(replication, be important to science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(replication, be such important function of science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(replication, be such important function of science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(replication, be in scientific experiments)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)