replication: be important in design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.63
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, configuration
Weight: 0.33
, synthesis
Weight: 0.33
, cell signaling
Weight: 0.32
, recombination
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in design 1.00
be important in design answerscom 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(function, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(replication, be important in design)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(function, be important in design)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in design)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(function, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(replication, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in design)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(replication, be important in design)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(replication, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(replication, be important in design answerscom)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(replication, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(replication, be important in design answerscom)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in design answerscom)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(replication, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in design answerscom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(replication, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(replication, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(replication, be important in design)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(function, be important in design)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(replication, be important in design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(function, be important in design)