replication: be important in experimental design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.63
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, configuration
Weight: 0.33
, synthesis
Weight: 0.33
, recombination
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in experimental design 1.00
be important in experimental design answerscom 1.00
be in scientific experiments important 0.79
be important in experiment 0.79
be in experiments important 0.79
be important in experiments 0.79
be in scientific experiments 0.77
be important element of scientific process 0.76
be necessary in experiment 0.75
be important in scientific research 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(replication, be important in experimental design)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(replication, be important in experimental design answerscom)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(replication, be important in experimental design answerscom)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in experimental design answerscom)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in experimental design answerscom)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(replication, be important in experiment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(replication, be in experiments important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(replication, be important in experiments)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(replication, be necessary in experiment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(replication, be important in experiments)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(replication, be in experiments important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(replication, be in scientific experiments)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(replication, be important in experiment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(replication, be in scientific experiments)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(replication, be necessary in experiment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(replication, be important element of scientific process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(replication, be necessary in experiment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(replication, be in experiments important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in experiments)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in experiment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(replication, be in scientific experiments)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in experiment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(replication, be in scientific experiments)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(replication, be in experiments important)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in experiments)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(replication, be necessary in experiment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in experimental design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(replication, be important in experimental design)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(replication, be important in experimental design)