replication: be important in research process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.63
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, configuration
Weight: 0.33
, synthesis
Weight: 0.33
, recombination
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in research process 1.00
be important in research 0.93
be important to research 0.93
be important to scientific process 0.91
be important in scientific research 0.88
be important element of scientific process 0.87
be in scientific experiments important 0.81
be important in scientific investigation 0.80
be important in science 0.79
be important to sociological research 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(replication, be important in research process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(technology, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in research process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(synthesis, be important in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(replication, be important in research process)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(replication, be important in research)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(replication, be important to research)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(replication, be important in research)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(replication, be important to research)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(replication, be important element of scientific process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in research)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(replication, be important to research)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(replication, be important element of scientific process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(replication, be important element of scientific process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(replication, be important in scientific investigation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(replication, be important in science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(replication, be important to sociological research)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(replication, be important in scientific investigation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(replication, be important in science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(replication, be important to sociological research)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in scientific investigation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(replication, be important to sociological research)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in research)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important element of scientific process)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to sociological research)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific investigation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in research process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(replication, be important in research process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(synthesis, be important in research)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(replication, be important in research process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)