replication: be important in scientific research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.63
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, configuration
Weight: 0.33
, synthesis
Weight: 0.33
, recombination
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in scientific research 1.00
be important to research 0.94
be important in research 0.94
be in scientific experiments important 0.92
be important to scientific process 0.90
be in scientific experiments 0.90
be important in research process 0.88
be important to sociological research 0.86
be important in science 0.86
be important to science 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(replication, be important in scientific research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, be important to science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(technology, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to science)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(synthesis, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(synthesis, be important in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(replication, be important in scientific research)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(replication, be important to research)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(replication, be important in research)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(replication, be important to research)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(replication, be important in research)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(replication, be in scientific experiments)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(replication, be in scientific experiments)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(replication, be important to research)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in research)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(replication, be important in research process)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(replication, be in scientific experiments)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(replication, be important in research process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(replication, be important to sociological research)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(replication, be important in science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(replication, be important to science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(replication, be important to sociological research)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(replication, be important in science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(replication, be important to science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in research process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(replication, be important to science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(replication, be important to sociological research)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in research)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to research)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in research process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to sociological research)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(replication, be in scientific experiments)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(replication, be important in scientific research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(synthesis, be important in research)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(replication, be important in scientific research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)