replication: be important to science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.63
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, configuration
Weight: 0.33
, synthesis
Weight: 0.33
, recombination
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to science 1.00
be important in science 1.00
be necessary in science 0.92
be such important function of science 0.88
be important in scientific research 0.86
be necessary in biology 0.84
be important to scientific process 0.84
be basis of good science 0.84
be in scientific experiments important 0.83
be basis of science 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(replication, be important to science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(replication, be important to science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, be important to science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(technology, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to science)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(replication, be important to science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(replication, be important to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(replication, be important to science)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(replication, be important in science)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(replication, be important in science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(replication, be necessary in science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(replication, be necessary in science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(replication, be necessary in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(replication, be such important function of science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(replication, be such important function of science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(replication, be basis of science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(replication, be basis of good science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(replication, be basis of good science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(replication, be necessary in biology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(replication, be basis of science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(replication, be necessary in biology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(replication, be basis of science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(replication, be such important function of science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(replication, be basis of good science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(replication, be necessary in biology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(replication, be basis of science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(replication, be such important function of science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to scientific process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(replication, be in scientific experiments important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(replication, be necessary in biology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(replication, be important to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(replication, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)