replication: be necessary in science

Related concepts

Parents	function Weight: 0.63 , feature Weight: 0.60 , operation Weight: 0.58 , technology Weight: 0.58
Siblings	trigonometric function Weight: 0.33 , configuration Weight: 0.33 , synthesis Weight: 0.33 , recombination Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be necessary in science	1.00
be important in science	0.93
be important to science	0.92
be necessary in biology	0.89
be such important function of science	0.85
be basis of good science	0.83
be basis of science	0.82
be important to scientific process	0.82
be important in scientific research	0.81
be in scientific experiments important	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(replication, be necessary in science)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(technology, be important to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(replication, be necessary in science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(technology, be important to science)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(technology, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to science)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(replication, be necessary in science)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(technology, be important to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(replication, be necessary in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(replication, be necessary in science)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(replication, be important to science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(replication, be important in science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(replication, be basis of science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(replication, be necessary in biology)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(replication, be basis of good science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(replication, be basis of science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(replication, be necessary in biology)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(replication, be basis of good science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(replication, be such important function of science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(replication, be basis of science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(replication, be such important function of science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(replication, be important to scientific process)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(replication, be necessary in biology)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(replication, be necessary in biology)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(replication, be basis of science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(replication, be important to science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(replication, be important in scientific research)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(replication, be important in science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(replication, be in scientific experiments important)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(replication, be basis of good science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(replication, be important to scientific process)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(replication, be important in science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(replication, be important to science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(replication, be in scientific experiments important)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(replication, be basis of good science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(replication, be important in scientific research)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(replication, be such important function of science)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(replication, be such important function of science)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(replication, be important to scientific process)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(replication, be in scientific experiments important)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(replication, be important to scientific process)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(replication, be in scientific experiments important)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(replication, be important in scientific research)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(replication, be important in scientific research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(replication, be necessary in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(replication, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)