report: be important to management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents analysis
Weight: 0.67
, evidence
Weight: 0.66
, study
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
Siblings article
Weight: 0.73
, opinion
Weight: 0.66
, publication
Weight: 0.65
, testimony
Weight: 0.63
, release
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to management 1.00
be based management important 0.92
be important in project management process 0.85
be important in medication management 0.83
be important in strategic planning 0.78
be important in business 0.78
be important for business 0.78
be important in planning 0.77
be important part of hipaa 0.76
be important in system 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(evidence, be based management important)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important to management)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important to management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(analysis, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important to management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(analysis, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important to management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(study, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important to management)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(policy, be important part of hipaa)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important to management)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(policy, be important in medication management)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important to management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(evidence, be based management important)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in medication management)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(study, be important for business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(policy, be important part of hipaa)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in planning)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be based management important)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in strategic planning)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(study, be important for business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in planning)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in medication management)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important part of hipaa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(evidence, be based management important)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(report, be important to management)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(policy, be important in medication management)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(report, be important to management)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(analysis, be important in strategic planning)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(report, be important to management)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(analysis, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(report, be important to management)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(study, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(report, be important to management)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(analysis, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(report, be important to management)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(policy, be important part of hipaa)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(report, be important to management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(opinion, be important in system)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(opinion, be important in system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(report, be important to management)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(report, be important in project management process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in project management process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(report, be important in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(report, be important in project management process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(report, be important in project management process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(report, be important in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(report, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(report, be important to management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(policy, be important in medication management)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(evidence, be based management important)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(policy, be important part of hipaa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(study, be important for business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(analysis, be important in business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(analysis, be important in planning)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(opinion, be important in system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(evidence, be based management important)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(policy, be important in medication management)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(study, be important for business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(analysis, be important in business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(policy, be important part of hipaa)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(analysis, be important in strategic planning)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(report, be important to management)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(analysis, be important in planning)