report: have bigger impact on game

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents analysis
Weight: 0.67
, evidence
Weight: 0.66
, study
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
Siblings article
Weight: 0.73
, opinion
Weight: 0.66
, publication
Weight: 0.65
, testimony
Weight: 0.63
, release
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bigger impact on game 1.00
have bigger impact 0.94
have impact on game 0.94
have impact 0.85
be on game 0.81
be in game 0.80
be better than sports 0.76
be more important than sports 0.76
play part in history 0.76
difference of is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(study, be more important than sports)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(report, have bigger impact on game)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(study, be better than sports)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(report, have bigger impact on game)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(study, be better than sports)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(study, be more important than sports)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(study, be better than sports)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(study, be more important than sports)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be on game)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(opinion, play part in history)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(opinion, difference of is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(study, be more important than sports)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(report, have bigger impact on game)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(study, be better than sports)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(report, have bigger impact on game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(opinion, difference of is good thing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(opinion, difference of is good thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(opinion, be on game)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(opinion, be on game)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(opinion, play part in history)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(opinion, play part in history)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(report, have bigger impact on game)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(report, have impact)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(report, have impact)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(report, have impact on game)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(report, have impact on game)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(report, have bigger impact)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(report, have impact on game)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(report, be in game)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(report, have bigger impact)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(report, have impact on game)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(report, have bigger impact)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(report, have impact)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(report, be in game)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(report, have bigger impact)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(report, be in game)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(report, be in game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(report, have impact)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(report, have bigger impact on game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(study, be better than sports)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(study, be more important than sports)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(opinion, difference of is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(opinion, be on game)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(opinion, play part in history)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(study, be better than sports)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(report, have bigger impact on game)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(study, be more important than sports)