reporter: be called hacks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journalist
Weight: 0.75
, idiot
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.55
Siblings stringer
Weight: 0.49
, editor
Weight: 0.34
, photographer
Weight: 0.34
, critic
Weight: 0.31
, waiter
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called hacks 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(journalist, be called hacks)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(reporter, be called hacks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(reporter, be called hacks)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(journalist, be called hacks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(reporter, be called hacks)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(journalist, be called hacks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(journalist, be called hacks)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(reporter, be called hacks)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(reporter, be called hacks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(reporter, be called hacks)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(reporter, be called hacks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(reporter, be called hacks)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(reporter, be called hacks)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(reporter, be called hacks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(reporter, be called hacks)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(reporter, be called hacks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(reporter, be called hacks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(journalist, be called hacks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(reporter, be called hacks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(journalist, be called hacks)