reporter: say look

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journalist
Weight: 0.75
, idiot
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.55
Siblings stringer
Weight: 0.49
, editor
Weight: 0.34
, photographer
Weight: 0.34
, critic
Weight: 0.31
, waiter
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
say look 1.00
say name 0.79
do 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(photographer, do)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(photographer, do)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(photographer, do)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(reporter, say look)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(reporter, do)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(reporter, do)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(reporter, say name)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(reporter, do)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(reporter, do)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(reporter, say name)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(reporter, say name)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(reporter, say name)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(reporter, say look)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(reporter, say look)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(reporter, say look)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(photographer, do)