representative: be elected into office

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.67
, officer
Weight: 0.67
, employee
Weight: 0.66
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.62
Siblings manager
Weight: 0.68
, observer
Weight: 0.59
, chairperson
Weight: 0.52
, family member
Weight: 0.37
, vice president
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be elected into office 1.00
be elected 0.91
be elected in country 0.88
be elected two years 0.85
be elected in democratic country 0.82
be elected to parliament 0.81
be elected to parliament of india 0.77
be appointed 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(member, be elected)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(representative, be elected into office)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(member, be appointed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(representative, be elected into office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(member, be elected)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(member, be appointed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(member, be elected)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(member, be appointed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vice president, be elected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(member, be elected)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(representative, be elected into office)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(member, be appointed)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(representative, be elected into office)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(vice president, be elected)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(vice president, be elected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(representative, be elected into office)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(representative, be elected)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(representative, be elected)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(representative, be elected in country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(representative, be elected)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(representative, be elected two years)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(representative, be elected in country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(representative, be elected in country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(representative, be elected in democratic country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(representative, be elected to parliament)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(representative, be elected two years)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(representative, be elected two years)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(representative, be elected to parliament of india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(representative, be appointed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(representative, be elected in democratic country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(representative, be appointed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(representative, be elected in democratic country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(representative, be elected to parliament)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(representative, be appointed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected in country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(representative, be elected to parliament)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected in democratic country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(representative, be elected to parliament of india)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(representative, be elected to parliament of india)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected to parliament)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected two years)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(representative, be appointed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected to parliament of india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(representative, be elected into office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(member, be elected)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(member, be appointed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vice president, be elected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(member, be elected)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(representative, be elected into office)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(member, be appointed)