representative: have different terms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.67
, officer
Weight: 0.67
, employee
Weight: 0.66
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.62
Siblings manager
Weight: 0.68
, observer
Weight: 0.59
, chairperson
Weight: 0.52
, family member
Weight: 0.37
, vice president
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have different terms 1.00
have terms 0.95
have 2 year terms 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(representative, have different terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(representative, have different terms)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(representative, have different terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(representative, have terms)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(representative, have different terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(representative, have 2 year terms)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(representative, have different terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(representative, have terms)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(representative, have different terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(representative, have terms)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(representative, have different terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(representative, have terms)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(representative, have different terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(representative, have 2 year terms)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(representative, have different terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(representative, have 2 year terms)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(representative, have different terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(representative, have 2 year terms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(representative, have different terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(representative, have different terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(representative, have different terms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(representative, have different terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(representative, have different terms)