representative: were to constitutional convention chosen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.67
, officer
Weight: 0.67
, employee
Weight: 0.66
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.62
Siblings manager
Weight: 0.68
, observer
Weight: 0.59
, chairperson
Weight: 0.52
, family member
Weight: 0.37
, vice president
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
were to constitutional convention chosen 1.00
were to constitutional convention 0.97
were to convention chosen 0.92
were to convention 0.88
were chosen serve in congress 0.81
be elected in democratic country 0.77
be from state chosen 0.76
were in house chosen 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(representative, were to constitutional convention)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(representative, were to convention chosen)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(representative, were to constitutional convention)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(representative, were to convention)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(representative, were to constitutional convention)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(representative, were to convention chosen)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(representative, were to convention chosen)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(representative, were to convention)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(representative, were to convention)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(representative, were chosen serve in congress)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(representative, be elected in democratic country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(representative, were in house chosen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(representative, were chosen serve in congress)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(representative, were to constitutional convention)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(representative, were in house chosen)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(representative, were chosen serve in congress)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(representative, be elected in democratic country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(representative, be from state chosen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(representative, were in house chosen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(representative, be from state chosen)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(representative, be elected in democratic country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(representative, were in house chosen)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected in democratic country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve in congress)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(representative, were to convention chosen)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(representative, were to convention)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)