reproduction: be advantageous to plants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.61
, behavior
Weight: 0.61
, detail
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings reproductive organ
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, replication
Weight: 0.32
, artifact
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be advantageous to plants 1.00
be important in plants 0.87
be necessary to plants 0.85
be in plants 0.83
be advantage in plants 0.83
be on land challenging for nonvascular plants 0.81
is beneficial 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(reproduction, be advantageous to plants)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be in plants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(reproduction, be in plants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(reproduction, be in plants)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be important in plants)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(reproduction, be in plants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be advantage in plants)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(reproduction, be necessary to plants)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(reproduction, be necessary to plants)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be necessary to plants)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(reproduction, be advantage in plants)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(reproduction, be advantage in plants)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(reproduction, be important in plants)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(reproduction, be important in plants)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(reproduction, be advantage in plants)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(reproduction, be important in plants)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(reproduction, be necessary to plants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be advantageous to plants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(reproduction, be advantageous to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(reproduction, be advantageous to plants)