reproduction: be in animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.61
, behavior
Weight: 0.61
, detail
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings reproductive organ
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, replication
Weight: 0.32
, artifact
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in animals 1.00
be better in wild than animals in zoo 0.87
be in birds 0.84
be in reptiles 0.83
be in birds adapted 0.79
be inherited in animals 0.78
take place in humans 0.76
occur in wolves 0.76
be important to kangaroos 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(behavior, be inherited in animals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(reproduction, be in animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(behavior, be inherited in animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be inherited in animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(behavior, be inherited in animals)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(reproduction, be in animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(reproduction, be in animals)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be better in wild than animals in zoo)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(reproduction, be better in wild than animals in zoo)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(reproduction, be better in wild than animals in zoo)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(reproduction, take place in humans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, occur in wolves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(reproduction, occur in wolves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(reproduction, occur in wolves)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be important to kangaroos)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(reproduction, be important to kangaroos)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(reproduction, take place in humans)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(reproduction, be better in wild than animals in zoo)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(reproduction, occur in wolves)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(reproduction, be important to kangaroos)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(reproduction, take place in humans)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(reproduction, be important to kangaroos)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, take place in humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be in animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(reproduction, be in animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(behavior, be inherited in animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(reproduction, be in animals)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(behavior, be inherited in animals)