reproduction: be on land challenging for nonvascular plants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.61
, behavior
Weight: 0.61
, detail
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings reproductive organ
Weight: 0.34
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, replication
Weight: 0.32
, artifact
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on land challenging for nonvascular plants 1.00
be important in plants 0.83
be advantageous to plants 0.81
be necessary to plants 0.81
be in plants 0.80
be important for species 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(behavior, be important for species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(behavior, be important for species)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be important for species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(behavior, be important for species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(reproduction, be in plants)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(reproduction, be in plants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be in plants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(reproduction, be in plants)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(reproduction, be advantageous to plants)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(reproduction, be necessary to plants)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(reproduction, be advantageous to plants)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be important in plants)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(reproduction, be advantageous to plants)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(reproduction, be important in plants)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be advantageous to plants)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(reproduction, be necessary to plants)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(reproduction, be important in plants)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(reproduction, be important in plants)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(reproduction, be necessary to plants)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be necessary to plants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(behavior, be important for species)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(reproduction, be on land challenging for nonvascular plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(behavior, be important for species)