reproductive system: has state complex

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organ
Weight: 0.66
, human body
Weight: 0.61
, abnormality
Weight: 0.57
, structure
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cervix
Weight: 0.54
, gonad
Weight: 0.48
, reproductive organ
Weight: 0.40
, endocrine system
Weight: 0.37
, digestive system
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state complex 1.00
is more complex 0.92
be very complex in nature 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(reproductive system, has state complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, be very complex in nature)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(reproductive system, has state complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(digestive system, be very complex in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(digestive system, be very complex in nature)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(reproductive system, has state complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(reproductive system, has state complex)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(reproductive system, has state complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(reproductive system, is more complex)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(reproductive system, has state complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(reproductive system, is more complex)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(reproductive system, has state complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(reproductive system, is more complex)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(reproductive system, has state complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(reproductive system, is more complex)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(reproductive system, has state complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(reproductive system, has state complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(reproductive system, has state complex)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(reproductive system, has state complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(reproductive system, has state complex)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(reproductive system, has state complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(digestive system, be very complex in nature)