reproductive system: is more complex

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organ
Weight: 0.66
, human body
Weight: 0.61
, abnormality
Weight: 0.57
, structure
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cervix
Weight: 0.54
, gonad
Weight: 0.48
, reproductive organ
Weight: 0.40
, endocrine system
Weight: 0.37
, digestive system
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more complex 1.00
has state complex 0.92
be very complex in nature 0.88
be more complex than tissues 0.83
be capable of more complicated functions 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(organ, be capable of more complicated functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(reproductive system, is more complex)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organ, be more complex than tissues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(reproductive system, is more complex)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(organ, be more complex than tissues)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(organ, be capable of more complicated functions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(organ, be more complex than tissues)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(organ, be capable of more complicated functions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digestive system, be very complex in nature)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(organ, be capable of more complicated functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(reproductive system, is more complex)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organ, be more complex than tissues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(reproductive system, is more complex)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(digestive system, be very complex in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(digestive system, be very complex in nature)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(reproductive system, is more complex)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(reproductive system, has state complex)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(reproductive system, has state complex)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(reproductive system, has state complex)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(reproductive system, has state complex)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(reproductive system, is more complex)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(reproductive system, is more complex)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(organ, be more complex than tissues)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(organ, be capable of more complicated functions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(digestive system, be very complex in nature)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(organ, be more complex than tissues)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(reproductive system, is more complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(organ, be capable of more complicated functions)