reptile: be better than amphibians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, cold blooded animal
Weight: 0.59
Siblings frog
Weight: 0.78
, turtle
Weight: 0.77
, lizard
Weight: 0.76
, alligator
Weight: 0.75
, monitor lizard
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than amphibians 1.00
be on better land than amphibians 0.96
be different from amphibians 0.95
be more developed than amphibians 0.95
is amphibians 0.95
be more advanced than amphibians 0.94
be related to amphibians 0.94
much better adapted land than amphibians 0.93
develop from species of amphibians 0.92
breathe than amphibians 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(frog, is amphibians)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(frog, is amphibians)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(frog, is amphibians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(reptile, be better than amphibians)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(reptile, be related to amphibians)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(reptile, develop from species of amphibians)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(reptile, be related to amphibians)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(reptile, much better adapted land than amphibians)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(reptile, develop from species of amphibians)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(reptile, much better adapted land than amphibians)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(reptile, develop from species of amphibians)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reptile, be related to amphibians)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(reptile, much better adapted land than amphibians)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(reptile, much better adapted land than amphibians)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be related to amphibians)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(reptile, develop from species of amphibians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be better than amphibians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(reptile, be better than amphibians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be better than amphibians)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(frog, is amphibians)