reptile: be related to mammals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, cold blooded animal
Weight: 0.59
Siblings frog
Weight: 0.78
, turtle
Weight: 0.77
, lizard
Weight: 0.76
, alligator
Weight: 0.75
, monitor lizard
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to mammals 1.00
eat less than mammals 0.88
be more advanced than mammals 0.86
be related to amphibians 0.86
develop from species of amphibians 0.84
be different from other vertebrates 0.84
be different from vertebrates 0.84
is vertebrates 0.84
be different from amphibians 0.82
is amphibians 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(frog, is amphibians)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(frog, is amphibians)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(frog, is amphibians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(reptile, be related to mammals)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reptile, eat less than mammals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(reptile, eat less than mammals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(reptile, is vertebrates)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be related to amphibians)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be more advanced than mammals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be different from other vertebrates)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(reptile, develop from species of amphibians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(reptile, is vertebrates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(reptile, eat less than mammals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(reptile, is vertebrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(reptile, is vertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(reptile, develop from species of amphibians)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(reptile, develop from species of amphibians)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(reptile, be more advanced than mammals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(reptile, be different from other vertebrates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(reptile, be related to amphibians)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(reptile, develop from species of amphibians)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(reptile, be different from other vertebrates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(reptile, be different from other vertebrates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(reptile, eat less than mammals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(reptile, be more advanced than mammals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(reptile, be more advanced than mammals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reptile, be related to amphibians)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(reptile, be related to amphibians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be related to mammals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(reptile, be related to mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be related to mammals)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(frog, is amphibians)