reptile: have scales

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, cold blooded animal
Weight: 0.59
Siblings frog
Weight: 0.78
, turtle
Weight: 0.77
, lizard
Weight: 0.76
, alligator
Weight: 0.75
, monitor lizard
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
have scales 1.00
be covered in scales 0.91
have waterproof scales 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(reptile, have scales)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lizard, have scales)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(reptile, have scales)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(lizard, have scales)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lizard, have scales)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(reptile, have scales)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(reptile, have scales)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(reptile, have scales)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(reptile, be covered in scales)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(reptile, have scales)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(reptile, be covered in scales)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(reptile, have scales)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(reptile, be covered in scales)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(reptile, have scales)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(reptile, be covered in scales)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(reptile, have scales)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(reptile, have scales)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(reptile, have scales)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(reptile, have scales)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(reptile, have scales)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(reptile, have scales)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lizard, have scales)