research: be classified according to types of analysis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, project
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lineage
Weight: 0.45
, translocation
Weight: 0.45
, study
Weight: 0.35
, nanotechnology
Weight: 0.34
, analysis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be classified according to types of analysis 1.00
be classified according to types 0.95
be classified according to choice 0.86
be classified according to purpose 0.85
be classified according to choice of answer 0.82
be classified according to goal 0.81
be classified according to choice of answer to problem 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(research, be classified according to types of analysis)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(research, be classified according to goal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(research, be classified according to purpose)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(research, be classified according to choice of answer to problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(research, be classified according to purpose)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(research, be classified according to choice of answer to problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(research, be classified according to purpose)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(research, be classified according to purpose)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(research, be classified according to choice of answer to problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(research, be classified according to goal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(research, be classified according to goal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(research, be classified according to choice of answer to problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(research, be classified according to goal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be classified according to types of analysis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(research, be classified according to types of analysis)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(research, be classified according to types of analysis)