research: be done in zoo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, project
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lineage
Weight: 0.45
, translocation
Weight: 0.45
, study
Weight: 0.35
, nanotechnology
Weight: 0.34
, analysis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be done in zoo 1.00
be done 0.77
is done 0.77
is is done 0.76
be done on rats 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(project, is done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(research, be done in zoo)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(project, is done)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(project, is done)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(study, be done on rats)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(analysis, is done)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(project, is done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(research, be done in zoo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(analysis, is done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(analysis, is done)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(study, be done on rats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(study, be done on rats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(research, be done in zoo)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(research, is done)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(research, is done)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(research, is done)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(research, is done)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(research, be done in zoo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(research, be done in zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(project, is done)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(analysis, is done)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(study, be done on rats)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(research, be done in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(project, is done)