research: be important in work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, project
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lineage
Weight: 0.45
, translocation
Weight: 0.45
, study
Weight: 0.35
, nanotechnology
Weight: 0.34
, analysis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in work 1.00
be important in beowulf 0.91
be important in social work 0.87
work 0.87
be important for us 0.85
be important to people 0.84
is more important 0.84
be important today 0.84
be important to us 0.84
be important for business 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(journal, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(research, be important in work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(research, be important in work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(research, be important in work)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(project, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(research, be important in work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(research, be important in work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(project, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(project, be important to us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sector, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(journal, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sector, is more important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(journal, work)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sector, work)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(project, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, be important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lineage, be important in beowulf)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(study, be important for business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(study, be important for us)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lineage, be important today)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(study, be important to people)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(journal, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(research, be important in work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sector, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(research, be important in work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(project, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(research, be important in work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(research, be important in work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(research, be important in work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(nanotechnology, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lineage, be important today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(lineage, be important today)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(study, be important to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(study, be important to people)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(study, be important for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(study, be important for us)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lineage, be important in beowulf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(lineage, be important in beowulf)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(study, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(study, be important for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(research, be important in work)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(research, work)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(research, be important for business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(research, work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(research, work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(research, be important for business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(research, be important for business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(research, be important for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(research, be important in work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(project, work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, be important to us)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sector, work)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(journal, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lineage, be important today)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(study, be important to people)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lineage, be important in beowulf)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(study, be important for us)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(study, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(project, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, be important to us)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sector, work)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(journal, work)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(research, be important in work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)