research: be in mathematics

Related concepts

Parents	journal Weight: 0.61 , concept Weight: 0.59 , project Weight: 0.58 , sector Weight: 0.58
Siblings	lineage Weight: 0.45 , translocation Weight: 0.45 , study Weight: 0.35 , nanotechnology Weight: 0.34 , analysis Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in mathematics	1.00
be in pure mathematics	0.92
be in mathematics performed	0.90
be in pure mathematics performed	0.86
be in science	0.83
is science	0.82
science	0.82
humanities	0.81
be in physics	0.81
be important in science	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(concept, be in physics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(research, be in mathematics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(concept, be in physics)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(concept, be in physics)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(study, humanities)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(study, science)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, is science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(concept, be in physics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(research, be in mathematics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(nanotechnology, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, is science)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(study, science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(study, science)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(analysis, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in science)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(study, humanities) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(study, humanities)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(research, be in mathematics)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(research, be in science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(research, be in science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(research, be in science)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(research, be in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(research, be in mathematics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(research, be in mathematics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(concept, be in physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(nanotechnology, is science)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(study, science)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in science)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(study, humanities)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(research, be in mathematics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(concept, be in physics)