research: be in science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, project
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lineage
Weight: 0.45
, translocation
Weight: 0.45
, study
Weight: 0.35
, nanotechnology
Weight: 0.34
, analysis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in science 1.00
is science 0.99
science 0.99
be important in science 0.96
be considered science 0.94
be important in science class 0.90
be connected to science 0.87
is difficult science 0.87
be related to material science 0.86
be in mathematics 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, is difficult science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(study, be connected to science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, is science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be related to material science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(nanotechnology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(study, science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(study, science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(study, be connected to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(study, be connected to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, be related to material science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(nanotechnology, is difficult science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, is difficult science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(analysis, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in science class)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(research, be in science)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(research, be considered science)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(research, be considered science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(research, be in mathematics)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(research, be considered science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(research, be considered science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(research, be in mathematics)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(research, be in mathematics)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(research, be in mathematics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(research, be in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be related to material science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(study, be connected to science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(study, science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, is difficult science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(analysis, be important in science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(analysis, be important in science class)