research: be integral part of designing process of aerospace product

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, project
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lineage
Weight: 0.45
, translocation
Weight: 0.45
, study
Weight: 0.35
, nanotechnology
Weight: 0.34
, analysis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be integral part of designing process of aerospace product 1.00
be integral part of process of aerospace product 0.97
be integral part of designing process 0.92
be integral part of process 0.86
is design 0.80
design 0.79
relate to fashion designing 0.78
be important in development 0.77
be important to development 0.77
be important for business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(project, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(project, be important in development)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in development)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(study, relate to fashion designing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(study, be important for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(project, be important in development)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(study, relate to fashion designing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(study, relate to fashion designing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(study, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(study, be important for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(research, is design)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(research, design)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(research, is design)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(research, design)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(research, is design)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(research, design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(research, be important to development)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(research, be important to development)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(research, be important to development)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(research, be important for business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(research, be important for business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(research, be important for business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(research, be important for business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(research, be important to development)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(research, is design)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(research, design)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(project, be important in development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(study, relate to fashion designing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(study, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(project, be important in development)