research: be mainly done in antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, project
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lineage
Weight: 0.45
, translocation
Weight: 0.45
, study
Weight: 0.35
, nanotechnology
Weight: 0.34
, analysis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be mainly done in antarctica 1.00
be done on populations 0.78
be done on small-isolated populations 0.78
being is done 0.78
be in antarctica 0.78
be done 0.77
is is done 0.77
is done 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(project, is done)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(research, be mainly done in antarctica)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(project, is done)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(project, is done)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(study, be done on small-isolated populations)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(analysis, is done)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(project, is done)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(research, be mainly done in antarctica)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(analysis, is done)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(analysis, is done)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(study, be done on small-isolated populations)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(study, be done on small-isolated populations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(research, be mainly done in antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(research, being is done)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(research, be in antarctica)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(research, be in antarctica)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(research, be in antarctica)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(research, is done)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(research, be in antarctica)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(research, being is done)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(research, is done)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(research, being is done)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(research, is done)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(research, being is done)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(research, is done)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(research, be mainly done in antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(research, be mainly done in antarctica)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(project, is done)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(analysis, is done)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(study, be done on small-isolated populations)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(research, be mainly done in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(project, is done)