research: be more expensive than secondary research

Related concepts

Parents	journal Weight: 0.61 , concept Weight: 0.59 , project Weight: 0.58 , sector Weight: 0.58
Siblings	lineage Weight: 0.45 , translocation Weight: 0.45 , study Weight: 0.35 , nanotechnology Weight: 0.34 , analysis Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more expensive than secondary research	1.00
be more expensive than research	0.93
differ from secondary research	0.87
be important in research	0.84
be called research	0.80
be better than primary	0.80
is more important	0.78
be better than public	0.78
be more effective than public sector	0.77
be less costly	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(journal, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(research, be more expensive than secondary research)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(sector, is more important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(research, be more expensive than secondary research)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(research, be more expensive than secondary research)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(research, be more expensive than secondary research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(sector, be better than public)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(journal, be important in research)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(sector, is more important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(journal, be important in research)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(sector, be more effective than public sector)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(journal, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(research, be more expensive than secondary research)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(sector, is more important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(research, be more expensive than secondary research)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(research, be more expensive than secondary research)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(sector, be more effective than public sector) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(research, be more expensive than secondary research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(research, be more expensive than secondary research)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(research, differ from secondary research)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(research, differ from secondary research)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(research, be called research)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(research, differ from secondary research)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(research, be called research)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(research, be called research)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(research, be less costly)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(research, differ from secondary research)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(research, be less costly)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(research, be less costly)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(research, be called research)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(research, be less costly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(research, be more expensive than secondary research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(sector, is more important)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(journal, be important in research)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(sector, be more effective than public sector)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(journal, be important in research)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(research, be more expensive than secondary research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(sector, is more important)