research: is design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, project
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lineage
Weight: 0.45
, translocation
Weight: 0.45
, study
Weight: 0.35
, nanotechnology
Weight: 0.34
, analysis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is design 1.00
design 0.99
relate to fashion designing 0.82
be integral part of designing process of aerospace product 0.80
be integral part of designing process 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(study, relate to fashion designing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(study, relate to fashion designing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(study, relate to fashion designing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(research, is design)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(research, design)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(research, design)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(research, design)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(research, design)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(research, be integral part of designing process of aerospace product)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(research, is design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(research, is design)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(research, is design)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(study, relate to fashion designing)