research: is scientific

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, project
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lineage
Weight: 0.45
, translocation
Weight: 0.45
, study
Weight: 0.35
, nanotechnology
Weight: 0.34
, analysis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is scientific 1.00
is scientific process 0.92
be said scientific 0.92
be referred to to scientific 0.91
be called scientific method 0.88
be believed scientific 0.88
is science 0.84
science 0.83
be in science 0.83
be important in scientific investigation 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(study, science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(nanotechnology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(study, science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(study, science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(research, is scientific)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(research, is scientific process)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(research, be said scientific)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(research, be said scientific)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(research, is scientific process)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(research, be referred to to scientific)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(research, be called scientific method)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(research, be believed scientific)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(research, be believed scientific)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(research, be referred to to scientific)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(research, be called scientific method)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(research, be in science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(research, be important in scientific investigation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(research, be in science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(research, be said scientific)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(research, is scientific process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(research, be referred to to scientific)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(research, be believed scientific)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(research, be referred to to scientific)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(research, be called scientific method)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(research, be said scientific)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(research, is scientific process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(research, be in science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(research, be called scientific method)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(research, be believed scientific)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(research, be important in scientific investigation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(research, be in science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(research, be important in scientific investigation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(research, be important in scientific investigation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(research, is scientific)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(research, is scientific)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, is science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(research, is scientific) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(study, science)