researcher: have studying use of alternative fuels agencies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.72
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.59
, study
Weight: 0.58
Siblings author
Weight: 0.73
, scientist
Weight: 0.70
, professor
Weight: 0.69
, colleague
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have studying use of alternative fuels agencies 1.00
develop types 0.76
develop new types 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(researcher, develop new types)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(researcher, develop types)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(researcher, develop types)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(researcher, develop types)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(researcher, develop types)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(researcher, develop new types)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(researcher, develop new types)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(researcher, develop new types)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(researcher, have studying use of alternative fuels agencies)