reservation: be in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.63
, order
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.54
Siblings rosebud
Weight: 0.45
, escort service
Weight: 0.34
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, service station
Weight: 0.33
, postal service
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in india 1.00
be important in india 0.97
be necessary in india 0.94
exist in india 0.93
is canada 0.83
is poor canada 0.81
be in present-day oklahoma 0.78
be set up in america 0.77
was set up in america 0.76
were set up in america 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(reservation, be in india)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(reservation, exist in india)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(reservation, be necessary in india)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reservation, be important in india)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(reservation, exist in india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(reservation, exist in india)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(reservation, is canada)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(reservation, be necessary in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(reservation, was set up in america)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(reservation, were set up in america)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(reservation, be set up in america)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(reservation, is poor canada)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(reservation, is canada)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(reservation, is canada)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(reservation, is canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be necessary in india)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(reservation, is poor canada)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(reservation, be set up in america)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(reservation, be necessary in india)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(reservation, be set up in america)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reservation, be important in india)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(reservation, was set up in america)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(reservation, is poor canada)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(reservation, were set up in america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(reservation, is poor canada)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(reservation, be in present-day oklahoma)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be important in india)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be set up in america)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(reservation, was set up in america)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(reservation, were set up in america)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(reservation, be important in india)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be in present-day oklahoma)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(reservation, be in present-day oklahoma)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(reservation, was set up in america)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(reservation, were set up in america)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(reservation, be in present-day oklahoma)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(reservation, be in india)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(reservation, be in india)